This is the blog of a Norwegian (Marianne, aka 'M') who moved to Australia in 2007 to be with Roger (aka R) and feels lucky to have escaped a comparatively communistic country with ridiculous weather!
Archive listing for July 2008
Perfectness
Posted in 'Roger' on July 2, 2008
Roger is the man of my dreams.
He's completely loyal and faithful. Roger is the only man I trust completely. I don't think he's capable of cheating on me. It would be completely out of character and against his nature.
In public he will back me up in any discussion, it doesn't matter if he thinks I'm wrong. If people get rude with me, he will let me sort them out, but if I need help dealing with them, he will always back me up and make the other person feel like an idiot.
He's not afraid to go against the flow. It doesn't matter what society has decided to think or feel about something, Roger will think it all through logically and decide what makes the most sense. Most of the time he will decide to do the opposite of what the rest of society does, just because he doesn't want to be a sheep.
He hates tradition. If tradition makes sense, he will do it. But if people are only doing traditional things because everyone else is doing it, he will reject it. Such as getting married or have kids.
He makes make me feel appreciated, even if it's just for the little things. He's completely honest. If he thinks I look like shit one day, he will tell me. So I know when he tells me I'm beautiful, he means it. He doesn't tell me he loves me all the time, he will only say it when he feels it. That way it doesn't become a meaningless phrase.
If he's feeling grumpy because he has to deal with stupid clients who frustrate him, he might get grumpy with me, but he will always apologise and hug me and make me feel special again within an hour.
He treats women as equals, and respects both men and women equally. He's not one of those guys who are completely in love with themselves and think they are God's gift to women, and who see women mainly as something to satisfy their sexual urges. These men will of course speak to women as if they respect them, but when it's just the guys, they will talk about women as if they are sex toys.
Roger could do that if he wanted. He's hot and has women falling over themselves to be with him, but he's just not interested in being that kinda guy.
He loves cats as much as I do. I've never met any guy who loves cats. I've met men who don't mind them, but they all prefer dogs. Roger prefers cats and doesn't want a dog because he feels no need to be in control of another creature. And not only does he love cats as much as I do, but he respects all animals and will defend any animal if he sees one being abused.
So Roger is perfect, and I adore him.
And it was his birthday yesterday. Happy b-day hunni:)
HAPPY BDAY ROGER!!! :) HOPE YOU HAVE A GREAT DAY <3
More proof men are pervs
Posted in 'Random stuff' on July 5, 2008
I've repeatedly said that men are pervs who will perv at any female skin. Most of the time I tell women this I'm met with disbelief and comments like 'well I don't get turned on if I see some guys penis, so why would they care if they see a bit of breast?' Yeah, cuz it's just impossible that men are programmed differently than women....
Anyway, I've been saying it, and here is more proof:
What exactly do women think is going to happen when they lie around topless? That men will show no interest in them whatsoever? I know men who go to the beach just to perv at girls in bikinis, and if they are topless that just gives guys something to think about when they have a pull later on.
I've even seen women who walk around in low cut tops and most of their breasts hang out, but as soon as a guy comments on their breasts, they get offended. Why? They must want men to notice their breasts, otherwise they wouldn't have them hanging out.
When R and I were in Norway in January this year, we bought a traditional Norwegian cheese slicer, because in Australia people cut their cheese with a knife, and I have never mastered that skill. I also don't like the thick slices you get when you cut it with a knife.
R has been telling me the whole time that the cheese slicer is dangerous, and an accident waiting to happen, because of the way you have to put your thumb behind it when you cut the cheese. My reply has always been 'don't be retarded, I've never heard of anyone in my entire life who has cut themselves on a cheese slicer. It's perfectly safe'.
Well, today I was proven wrong. I was making lunch for R, and someone hadn't covered up the cheese properly, so it had gone hard. When I attempted to slice it, the slicer slipped and sliced my thumb instead. It was a blood bath.
I while back I told R my hay fever is at the point where I wouldn't know if I got a cold or not. My nose is always runny and itchy, I'm always sneezing and coughing and my nose is always sore from sneezing.
And now I think I might be sick, but there's no way of telling. I feel sick, but I don't know if I am. My throat has been sore and itchy the last couple of days, but it's just as likely to be because of the sneezing as because of a cold.
I'm feeling stuffier and sleepier than normal tho, so I'm guessing it's a cold, but apart from that it's no different from normal. That's kinda sad isn't it.
aww, you should really work on curing your hayfever you know. Things would be heaps better if you did.
Ivana:
Sorry to read that you have not been feeling well. Allergies caused by pollens can make us feel awful, especially if we are exposed to new pollens in new countries.
I will suggest that you check to find out whether Loratadine is available in Australia... It is the best and most effective antihistimine I have ever taken, and it doesn't make a person feel tired.
Here in the US it is available "over the counter," a misleading term which means that you can simply buy it in a pharmacy/chemists without a prescription.
If you suspect you may not be dealing with an allergy, it would probably be best to visit a doc as soon as you can. Hope you feel better soon!
M:
Roger: feel free to suggest how to 'fix' my hay fever.
Ivana: It's not a new thing, I've been allergic to pollen for years, but in Norway the pollen season is very short. Here in Australia it never gets so cold that plants stop producing pollen, so my hay fever is constant.
In Usa, is it normal to go and see a doctor if you have a cold? And if so, what does the doctor do about it?
R:
Inundate yourself with pollen until your body learnsa to deal with it. It's how I cured myself.
Ivana:
To my knowledge, it is not normal to go to a doctor over here if you have a cold. Nor is it a good idea, because you might infect others. You just stay at home with aspirin and sweet, sticky syrups and only call the doc if you sense it might be developing into bronchitis or pneumonia. This is especially important if you are old. Then the doc might prescribe antibiotics as a preventive measure.
R: ein bisschen Mitgefühl, bitte sehr!
M:
R: I have been exposed to pollen for over a year now. You'd think that would be long enough for my body to realise it's harmless wouldn't ya?
Ivana: Ok:) I'm feeling better than I was a few days ago, but my nose is still being really annoying and I'm coughing more than normal. I still don't know if I'm actually sick or if there's an increased amount of pollen which is causing it.
Ivana:
You have my continued wishes for a full recovery. Allergies are no minor matter, and an overexposure to pollens can occasionally induce life-threatening seizures. A friend of ours, who moved to Nicaragua several years ago, was twice hospitalised for allergies to the local flora. Thankfully, she has found the right antihistimine in the meantime.
R: the suggestion to "inundate yourself with pollen" is not the correct action for all cases and all individuals. But please tell us: how did you manage to inoculate yourself? Perhpas your technique should be reported to the Royal Society of Medicine.
M:
Thanks:)
My cold is gone. I still have a weird thing happening with my nose, but it's getting better. I got the anithistamine you recommended and my hay fever has gotten slightly better.
There are many things about R which would make him interesting to science. I'd rather not have him experimented on tho, so we keep it quiet:)
Sharing a printer
Posted in 'Vista' on July 10, 2008
To my great surprise, Vista has not been annoying me much this time around. Probably because I expected it to be very annoying. But just when I start to think Vista isn't too bad, something happens to show how inferior it is to XP.
I wanted to print something yesterday, and because it's the first time I've needed to print anything since I bought my new computer, I had not yet added the shared printer to my computer.
So I tried to add it, but got this:
For some unknown reason, Vista cannot add a printer which every XP computer in the house is using.
We've never had a problem with this printer with any XP computer. And because R is into web development, there are a lot of computers here. The only time there was a problem was the other day with a Vista computer.
So yes, it's odd.
Theory of Crying
Posted in 'Roger' on July 13, 2008
A while ago I had a convo with R which went something like this:
Me: I wonder why men don't cry in a situation where a woman would. I'd be interested to know if it's just because women are brought up differently, or if it's an actual physiological difference between the genders. R: You can stop yourself from crying. You don't have to cry, you let yourself. Me: I can't stop myself from crying. When I cry, it's because I have to. R: Really? Wow... Me: So men never need to cry, whenever they cry it's because they let themselves? R: Pretty much.
Today I followed up on this conversation:
Me: I've figured out why men can stop themselves from crying when women can't. R: Why? Me: Men's feelings are inferior to women's feelings. R: ? Me: Up to a certain level of sadness, I can stop myself from crying. So women reach the level of sadness where they need to cry more easily than men, because men are incapable of feeling that sad. So men's capability to feel is inferior to women's. R: Makes sense. That would explain why men often feel that women overreact. Me: Yep.
There's one thing about Australia that absolutely shits me.
Australia has this thing where they don't like people who brag and think they are really good, and they like underdogs. Which is fine. It's just when they take it too far that it gets stupid.
There's this current affairs show, called 'A current affair' where recently there was a story about a family who had put themselves in debt because one of the big credit card companies had offered them a credit card. They had accepted it and spent a stupid amount of money, which they were having huge problems repaying. They then blamed the credit card company for offering them a credit card.
Even more recently, they had a story about an old man who was at the airport with his family. He couldn't move around very easily, so the fam wanted a wheel chair for him. The airline was understaffed, and unable to provide one. The fam then tried to check in for him, but was told he had to check in in person. So the family put him on the escalator, resulting in the guy falling down the escalator and being seriously injured. The family then went on the current affairs show and blamed the airline for failing to provide the wheel chair.
And the current affairs show took their side. Not once did they ask 'but don't you think you're responsible for how much money you spend?' or 'why didn't you take the lift down, instead of putting a man who can hardly walk on the escalator?'
To me it's glaringly obvious that these people acted stupidly, and are now facing the consequences. Everyone else seems to think 'awww poor them, they got screwed over by a big powerful company'.
I wouldn't put much faith in what they show on current affairs being the view of the majority.
I think most people, like myself who watched that one about the guy at the airport would have thought they were idiots for not being able to take care of themselves.
The Current affairs programs seem to think there is a good story whenever they attack large companies, because they think they win a few ratings votes from it, but I think most people are fair in their assessment of things. I have watched such stories with friends, and usually, we call the people whinging about things idiots for getting themselves into situations.
People get into debt, that's their fault. if people hurt themselves and there is no negligence on behalf of anyone else that caused or contributed to the injury - that's their fault.
Have these people, who in most cases manges to get themselves in these situations, started to sue these big companies yet... like they do for everything here in the US?
Not that I know of. I'm pretty sure Australia doesn't get the same amount of ridiculous cases as Usa. Fortunately.
One month with Thai
Posted in 'The cats and the dog!' on July 21, 2008
Thai started having 'accidents' after about a week. We ignored it at first, because we figured it's a big house and she might not be able to find the tray in time. She only had accidents when she was allowed to wander freely around the whole house, while when she was confined to the bedroom and outside area she would always use the tray. Pet Rescue also told us they noticed she does seem to get confused when she has to keep track of a larger area, but she's fine when she's confined to a small area.
But then she kept going into R's office to pee on the floor, pretty much every morning. Whenever something scared her, she would run back to the bedroom where she felt safe. So it was obvious that she knew where everything was, she just chose to pee in R's office.
In addition to the peeing, she also showed some aggressive tendencies. Most the time she would be fine, but whenever she was doing something wrong and we would try to correct her behaviour, she would scream at us and try to attack us. We then decided it was time to try the anti-anxiety/anti-OCD medication Pet Rescue recommended.
She will only eat dry food, and only out of her bowl, so I just put the tiny pill in with her food in the evening and it would be eaten along with the rest of the food. At least for the first few days. Then for some reason she started leaving it. Because she's not very trusting to begin with, we didn't wanna grab her and force it down her throat. She didn't have any accidents while she was on the medication, but that could also be because she was being watched closely whenever she was wandering around the house, and the amount of time she was allowed out of the bedroom was reduced at that time because we were busy with other stuff.
She seems to be trusting us more lately, and will come and greet us and has started telling us when she wants something. But she's still going into R's office to pee in the morning, and if we close the door to the office, she will go to the lounge instead. We follow her around these days and tell her off if she looks like she's about to pee and pick her up and put her on the tray. She protests wildly to being carried and will hiss and growl.
I see no good reason for her to still be having accidents tho.
We have also realised we will need to keep her, as she's just settling in. We think it would be cruel to allow her to settle in only to have her rehomed. And even if she stops peeing everywhere while she's here, the whole thing will start over once she moves to a new house, and Pet Rescue has told me they doubt they'll be able to find someone understanding enough to adopt a cat who will pee on the floor regularly for the first few weeks/months.
Edit: Just had a long chat with the person from Pet Rescue, because I sent them an email saying that I wanted to take Thai to the vet to rule out a medical problem. She had asked her vet about it, and the vet said it definitely doesn't sound like a medical problem. If I wanna take her to the vet for my own peace of mind I can, but she doesn't think it's needed. She also thinks Thai needs to go back on the medication, as it needs at least a month to take full effect. She gave me some advice on how to get Thai to eat her pill, so we will try that and see how she is in a month.
Hmm... I've read this several times and I'm trying to figure out what could help Thai.
If she was my cat I would have placed a tray in the room she pees in. If she has a particular spot where she pees then put the tray there for a while. If she goes on it, then you can just move it after a while and she will probably follow it. If she does not go on it, try to gently pick her up and put her on the tray when you see her getting ready to pee or if she pees. And remember to praise her. Because she has an anxiety issue I would use a positive reinforcement strategy and not tell her off (well, a positive reinforcement strategy is the way to go with any animal).
There is a meaning to her behaviour, you guys just have to figure out what causes it.
How many trays do you guys have in the house? Does any of the other cats use the tray she's supposed to use in the morning (cats are picky about their trays). And is she using the tray she's supposed to the rest of the times? Have you started using a different brand of cat litter?
If nothing of this helps it would be wise to consult a vet to rule out any medical problems (urinary tract infections etc).
If her peeing is solely connected to her anxiety and OCD issues, you need a way of appeasing her and break her routine (well, that one you've figured out of course). Is she getting enough exercise? Does she feel threatened by the other cats or something outside the house?
By the way, I've heard a lot of nice things about a book called "Don’t Shoot The Dog: The New Art of Teaching and Training" by Karen Pryor. I've been meaning to read it for ages but I've never got around to it.
Yes, I find it very strange that she chooses to not use the tray. She does use the tray occasionally, or when we put her on it, it's just in the morning she looks for somewhere else to pee. She has the bedroom to herself at night, so the other cats can't use her tray.
She has become very tolerant of the other cats, so I don't think that's the problem. The litter has not been changed since she got here, but I would have no idea what her previous owner used. I can't think of anything that would make her not want to use her tray, and we went through the whole thing when Thomas was peeing everywhere so we know what to look for.
She's just a big mystery.
Personally I try to use positive reinforcement, mixed in with negative reinforcement. Such as when a cat is about to pee somewhere I will say 'no!' pick it up and put it on the tray. If the cat then uses the tray I will tell it how good it is. If the cat did nothing wrong, but I see it using the scratching post, or in Thai's case,the tray, I will tell them they are being good. Most of the time it seems to work really well, but it doesn't seem to have much effect on Thai...
The training of animals is something that has fascinated me for a long time, and I'm familiar with clickers and positive reinforcement and all that. Sometimes you just have to get physical tho. One of our cats, Odo, use to have this thing where whenever we ate he will come along and sat about 20 cm from us and stare at us, hoping to get a snack. He would also stick his face and paws in my food, which I didn't particularly enjoy. Obviously waiting for him to stop to reward him for stopping wouldn't work, because he's rewarding himself by eating my food. So what I would do is whenever he put one of his body parts in my food I would push him away and say 'no' and I would continue to do that until he realised there was no point, he wasn't getting any food for that behaviour. Then he would just lie down about a metre from me and look all miserable. I would then reward him by giving him some of my food, and he quickly learnt that by lying down near me instead of trying to steal my food, he would get food.
R:
Just thought I'd clarify.... When you say "the litter has not been changed since she got here" you are talking about the brand/type, not the actual litter in the tray.....
M:
Yes, of course:) The actual litter is changed every evening.
Undre:
R: Good thing! ;) Well, I figured that was what M meant cuz I assume you guys would not like to live a cat's toilet. (^_^)
The peeing obviously means or indicates something. So I guess you guys just have to keep on being detectives and rule out options and see what you are left with.
Maybe there is a cat psychologist/behaviourist of some sort that you can consult? I'm sure she will stop peeing away from her tray eventually, but because she has anxiety and OCD issues she probably could do with some help.
The training of animals is an art really. So is communicating with animals too.
There is this dog training show on TVNorge right now that is just awful. This American guy, Cesar, is supposed to be a dog whisperer, but I've never seen such manhandling of dogs ever (he "whispers" with his fists really). This TV series is broadcasted all over the world and it just scares me how ignorant people will get inspiration from this show about how to train there dogs. His method is to use a mix of physical and psychological violence to control the animals. And he is constantly talking about getting the dog to be submissive. He completely ignores dogs that are showing stress symptoms and are using calming signs to calm themselves and him down. Calming signs are so incredibly important to dogs and I would never trust a dog trainer that ignores them.
He is supposed to be very successful, however the thing is that if one is trained in a positive reinforcement method one will get the same result using that without causing the animal any harm, and your animal will feel safer and more secure. And being able to train an animal with a positive reinforcement method a much greater skill than manhandling them.
Jeg vet ikke om denne serien blir sendt i Australia. Jeg håper for australske hunders skyld at den ikke blir det. Ut fra de hundeseriene som har blitt sendt på norsk TV de siste åra så tror jeg kattene skal prise seg lykkelig over at ingen har begynt å produsere "katte-TV" ennå(!). Det er noe seriøst galt oppe i hodet på ganske mange hundetrenere. Av en eller annen grunn har de enormt behov for å dominere og ser nærmest på hunden sin som sin antagonist.
M:
I know about the show. I don't think it has reached Australia yet, but I heard about him in a Norry forum and watched some videos on youtube and yes, it's just horrible how he's allowed to do that to dogs. He's basically treating symptoms, and not the actual cause for the symptoms. The only thing he will accomplish is that the scared dog will stop growling at other dogs because it know it will get punished for it, but one day that dog will attack some other dog without any warning. It's still scared of the other dog, but it's also scared to show that it's scared, so it will give no warning that it's scared and feels it needs to protect itself. What he should be doing is making the dog feel safe around other dogs. The cause of the symptoms would then be gone, and so the symptoms (growling, barking etc) would be gone too.
I emailed both TVNorge and Mattilsynet about this show, and told them about the Norry rule saying it's illegal to use violence when training dogs, but I never heard back from them, and I guess it was never taken off the air.
Sad.
Undre:
That's a very precise analysis of what he is doing and why it is so wrong!
He is so obsessed with getting the dogs to be submissive that he just is incapable of relating to it as an individual and getting to know it. He just sees the dog as something that should be defeated. Actually he lacks a lot of knowledge about dogs.
Dogs are very sensitive creatures and they have a very sensitive language. Dogs that have owners that look after them and takes proper care of them do not go around trying to dominate each other. The only dogs I have ever had trouble relating to are dogs that are really scared and that has not had owners that have recognised the dog's anxiety and been able to deal with it. And of course the most important thing is to avoid anxiety and aggression issues altogether and I really don't think people learn that from Millan's show.
To people that wants to dominate and control, Millan's ways are very appealing because they get to see very effective domination techniques, but these techniques are very similar to torture techniques and the dogs are bound to have a lot of suppressed anger and anxiety after experiencing this - and no way of releasing it.
I'm very glad to hear that you contacted TVNorge and Mattilsynet. It's too bad you have not gotten any replies. TVNorge will of course not stop sending this show as long as people watch it and the more it is discussed the more viewers they get. Mattilsynet on the other hand should have done something.
Can Thai get outside? Perhaps, formerly, it was trained to go outside to go to the toilet. Perhaps now being inside it is trying to find the closest thing to 'outside' i.e. carpet rather than a hard floor or container. Just an idea.
M:
Undre: I really hope his show never makes it here. I have a feeling it wouldn't last long if it did tho, because Australia has a lot of animal welfare organisations and I doubt they would sit back and allow the show to continue. But still, it might give people ideas, and I'd prefer if the tv stations never even considered it.
E: Thai has been an indoor cat her whole life, so she's used to the tray. Even my Julie who had never seen a tray before at the age of 1 and a half needed about a day to figure out that the tray was the best place to go. My experience is that cat *want* to use a tray, because it's natural for them to dig and bury it, and floors don't allow that.
Ivana:
While I occasionally and masochistically surf all the 250+ TV channels available to North American cable viewers (this is done in secret at a friend's house, as Will would never approve), I have never come across Cesar Millan.
A bit of Web searching reveals that he is a Mexican who has tried to make it big in the US. Also, he has caused storms of protest, not least from the American Humane Society, which has demanded that his programs be removed.
I have been to Mexico many times and have been appalled at the ways they treat their dogs, cats, horses and donkeys. Millan represents well the disregard his countrymen have for animals, and it is disgraceful that TV stations should continue to broadcast this slick self-promoter.
M:
So his show is not broadcast in Usa either?
If it was a show which was popular in Usa, I could understand why Norry tv stations would want to copy it, it's what they do. But I wonder where they got the idea from then... It's such a primitive way to train dogs...
New design
Posted in 'Random stuff' on July 22, 2008
My blog has a new design:)
R suggested to me a few weeks ago that it was time I renew my blog design, so I started working on one. I spent about a week on it, and then realised I didn't like it, and gave up on the whole thing. I figured if I wasn't able to come up with a new design, I didn't deserve to have my blog redesigned.
Then one day I was playing around in Photoshop and thought I'd try to make auroras digitally, seeing as I'd never seen any good digitally made auroras anywhere. I thought 'it must be really diffcult' but decided to try anyway. It took me about 10 minutes and 1 try to get it right. So it wasn't difficult at all, people who do them just don't know what auroras look like.
And after I'd made the auroras I thought 'wonder how it would look as the header image on a web page' so I just started putting together a web site to see what it would look like, and used my own site for reference, just for fun. But after I'd spent some time putting it all together I realised 'hey, this might be good enough to be my new blog design!'
So there it was. Completely unintentionally I designed my new blog.
It has also been changed to work with R's cms, which has a blog module that was built and integrated based on my blog in the first place. This means I get to discover any bugs in the blog side of his system before any clients start using it.
The navigation panel is gone too. There wasn't much point in having a photos page when I have a site entirely dedicated to photos, so that's gone. The drawings will also be moved to the photo site, and the dictionary has been abandoned completely.
If they pay someone to provide a service, they don't even stand up for themselves and demand to get what they pay for. If the person doesn't do the job properly, they will let them keep the money they paid them, and simply pay extra for someone else to do it.
I just read in a forum that someone paid a guy to measure up a saddle for her horse. When she got the saddle she thought it looked a bit big, but the guy said it fitted perfectly and she believed him. But after one ride using the new saddle, the horse had back pains and the saddle was also rubbing the fur off part of its back.
So the owner of the horse said 'well now it's gonna cost me extra. I have to go and buy a new saddle' instead of telling the guy who measured it all up to come back and do it again, because obviously he made a mistake. She could even ask for her money back, seeing as he didn't provide the service he was supposed to. But no, she's letting him get away with it, and will go and spend extra money on a new saddle.
And it's like Norwegians never expect any service from store staff.
There was another incident in the same forum a few weeks ago. A woman in there was telling everyone about the great service an online store had provided. She had ordered 2 things from their website. After she ordered they emailed her and said they'd stopped selling one of the products, but they could send the other thing she ordered. She then told them she needed both things for a competition, but that it was fine, she'd be happy if they just sent one item. The store then told her they had some left in stock, so they would send her both items anyway. And she thought this was really great and that they were awesome people.
I told her if the product was still listed on their website and they had it in stock, I would expect them to send it. If they don't wanna sell it they should remove it from their website.
Norwegians also seem to think they need to choose the most difficult way to do something, otherwise they don't deserve any reward for it.
Such as when someone in a forum complained that someone she knew had neutered their dog just because he was so difficult to train.
I asked 'so what? At least the dog got neutered, which is good. Who cares why he did it?'
And she said 'well I don't think it's right to neuter a dog just because it's a bit difficult to train'.
I couldn't see the problem. Obviously all dogs should be neutered, and if it makes him easier to train, what's the problem? It means a happier owner and a happier dog. But the person in the forum felt that if the owner wasn't willing to put extra time and effort into training a difficult hormonal dog, he didn't deserve to have a well trained dog.
And you can hardly find any automatic cars in Norway. Nearly everyone buys manuals. Even when you get a rental car it's a manual. While here in Australia, nearly everyone gets automatics. They cost about $2000 more than a manual here, just like in Norway, but everyone chooses to spend that much extra. You'd never get a manual rental either, unless you specifically asked for one.
It's not the lack of money that stops Norwegians from getting automatic cars. I suspect it's because it would make driving 'too easy'.
It's weird. What's wrong with making life easier? As if most people don't have enough to worry about, without deliberately making life more difficult.
You write that "Norwegians seem to think they need to choose the most difficult way to do something, otherwise they don't deserve any reward for it." Do you think there is any historical or cultural explanation for this (Lutheranism, Haugianism, Janteloven etc.)?
Ivana:
Whoops, the "Anonymous" above was me. Sorry for being incognito...
M:
Yes, I suspect there is an historical reason for it, but I can't find one that fully explains it. Norway was basically a 3rd world country until the 60s or 70s, so I would guess that people appreciate hard work and being rewarded for it.
But I suspect life woulda been difficult for the British criminals who first came to Australia too, and they know how to make life convenient for themselves, without being lazy.
And another thing that doesn't make sense is that Norwegian have terrible work ethics, they will call in sick if they just don't feel like going to work one day, while Australian will go to work no matter what, and have to be encouraged to stay home when they're sick. So hardship in the past is not enough to explain it.
If you have any theories feel free:)
Cool non-nerd
Posted in 'Random stuff' on July 22, 2008
That's what this test called me:
So I'm not a geek like I thought I was and apparently I know a freakish amount about sci-fi and comics....
On Saturday we went to our friend Olivia's karate grading. She was being graded for a black belt.
In the same group there were also kids and people in their 50s and 60s, and also a person in a wheel chair. All being graded for a black belt. The instructor said people are not graded on their actual karate ability, but on whether they are doing their best or not. So a 60 year old would not be expected to be able to do the same things as a 15 year old, and the person in the wheel chair just sat there doing hand movements the whole time. A lof the people there couldn't kick properly, or balance properly. A lot of them couldn't even do the stretching exercises.
To me, that cheapens a black belt. When someone says they have a black belt in karate, you'd think they were really good, their karate skills should be perfect. But they're not. Anyone can get a black belt these days.
Instead of saying 'as long as you do your best, we'll give you a black belt', they should make a list of the stuff you have to be able to do to get a black belt. So if you're 60, you might be able to advance as far as the green belt, but that's it. A person in a wheel chair who can only do hand movements might get a yellow belt, at best.
That way you would know that a person with a black belt have perfect karate skills.
I know why they don't do it that way of course. They want everyone to be able to do karate, because they make more money that way.
Good for them, but sad for karate.
(Olivia did of course deserve the black belt she got:))
Posted in 'Aquariums and Birdies' on July 28, 2008
This weekend I decided to rearrange my fish tanks. I had been wanting to change from gravel to sand for some time, because all fish like sand, but not all of them like gravel. I have loaches, which prefer sand. I also find that sand looks more natural than gravel. Cuz, really, how often do you see a lake or river with a gravel bottom?
So I removed all the ornaments from the tank, and all the plants I didn't wanna keep. Most of them were cheap and did nothing to improve the look of the tank. I only kept one plant, which had grown to the size of a bush, and it looked really healthy and good. I let that float around in there while I worked to give the fish something to hide in to reduce stress. I then removed all the gravel, which took a while, and then added a thin layer of sand. I then put the fake log ornament back in because the loaches love to hide in it, but decided the ruin didn't fit with the natural look I was going for, so I left that out. The big plant was cut into 5 smaller pieces which were planted pretty much at random. They will look good and provide good hiding places for the fish when they get bigger. I also put the terracotta pot back in, because my red tailed shark has become attached to it, and will rest in it and swim back to it whenever something scares him.
What I didn't think of was that now all my fish are more obvious, which is good. They all kind of blended in with the dark gravel before.
Seeing as I got my tax money recently, I also decided to replace the plastic tank in my room with a proper glass one:
The killies have this tank to themselves now, because I decided I didn't want the snails in there. They have a nasty habit of eating the plants. That's why the plants look a bit sick, but they'll recover. It does leave the problem of what to do with the snails tho. I can either leave the plastic tank and keep it as a snail tank, or I can get rid of the old tank and get rid of the snails, or I can get rid of the plants and get some plants the snails don't like the taste of.
The yarn in this tank isn't permant by the way, that's just cuz the killies like to lay their eggs in them, and I'm trying to hatch some.
Vista just did something exceptionally stupid. I was having problems connecting to the internet, so I clicked 'diagnose the problem' and it then told me what was wrong. I wanted to read more about how to fix it so I clicked the 'help' button. And it popped up a message saying it couldn't show me the help for this problem because it couldn't connect to the internet.
I generally don´t like the idea of abortion: Killing someone or something before it really had a chance to live. But in the case with Vista, I think everyone would have been better off if it never had come to be. DOS is still the best OS Microsoft has made. After they started with graphic user interfaces, Windows 2000 was the greatest achievement. Since than it has just gone downwards...
M:
I rather like XP actually...
R:
yeah, you can do SO much with DOS, I like to visit websites with it.
1. Rækker ud efter den nærmeste bog 2. Slår op på side 123 3. Finder den femte sætning på siden 4. Lægger denne og de følgende to sætninger ud på webloggen (sammen med instruktionerne) 5. Kommenterer citatet 6. Sender legen videre til fem andre personer og krediterer den som sendte legen til en.
In English that means:
Here's what you do:
1. Grab your nearest book 2. Open page 123 3. Find the fifth sentence on the page 4. Post this and the following 2 sentences on your blog 5. Comment on this quote 6. Tag someone else and credit the person who tagged you
Well! I had 2 fictional books lying around until a few minutes ago when R implied that I'm a messy person and told me to put them in the book shelf. That makes the nearest book 'SEO - Search engine optimization - Bible' by Jerri L. Ledford:
Keyword stuffing, purposely or not, occurs in several ways on web pages. The first is when the writer includes on the web page (usually at the bottom, but it can be anywhere) a block of text that is nothing more than a repetition of the chosen keyword, like this:
Sometimes, this block of text is shown in the same font that other text on the page is shown; however, it's not unusual for a block of text like this to be colored the same color as the page background so that it's invisible to visitors, but perfectly readable by search engine crawlers.
And this is a big no-no when you're trying to optimise your website for search engines, because you will get listed very low, or banned altogether.
I'm reading this book because I'm getting into SEO, which is really good when you do it right, and very bad when you get it wrong. R allowed me to use his e-newsletter system to play with, and I'm about to optimise a website for one of his clients too. They've had their e-commerce site up and running for a year, but have not made a single sale. Because they are such nice people we have decided to optimise their site for free. Normally this service would cost about $350 per month.
Anyone who feels like it may consider themselves tagged.
I'm guessing since my blog gets lots and lots of clicks from search enginges WordPress are very good at SEO then? (Cuz I haven't done a thing. ;) )
M on 10 Aug, 2008 - 8:38 pm:
Popularity has a lot to do with PageRank, so because you have a lot of visitors the search engine crawler will take that into account when displaying results. It will assume that your site it relevant for the search term because it gets a lot og visits:)
Bit silly really, you have to be popular (=have good PageRank) to be listed high in search results, but you have to be listed high to become popular...
Undre on 11 Aug, 2008 - 3:26 am:
Hmm.. that kind of is a vicious circle then. If a page is hyped on the search engines' lists because it has a lot of visitors and people visit the site because it has a high page rank, then a lot of relevant information is burried.
I tend to write about some things that not many other Norwegians sites write about, so I'm guessing some of the visits can be explained because of that.
I'm also guessing that the tag and category system that WordPress introduced to the blogs also helps because every tag and category has its own page which I'm guessing makes the blogposts and blogs seem more important and relevant than they infact are.
M on 11 Aug, 2008 - 10:46 am:
The search engines don't look at popularity alone, it also looks at the site title and compares it to the content, file name, alt tags and it looks at links within the site, which other sites you link to, which sites link to your site etc etc.
Search engines crawlers also checkes for sites which are using dirty tricks to achieve a high ranking, and these will be delisted or listed very low..
It's quite complicated, but if you search for something in Google you usually get relevant results, so I guess it works:)
Lion reunion
Posted in 'Random stuff' on July 30, 2008
This is the most adorable thing I have seen for a long time. These 2 English guys bought a lion cub from Harrods in the 60s, because you could buy pretty much any exotic animal there at the time, and raised him in London. When he became an adult they decided to take him to Africa to release him into the wild.
HAPPY BDAY ROGER!!! :) HOPE YOU HAVE A GREAT DAY <3